Honors

Kammen Law Fighting For Your Rights

Welcome /
Honors /

We represent individuals accused of the following

White Collar Crime

What sets white collar crimes apart from other offenses is ordinarily the length and scope of the prosecution's criminal investigation and, as a result, the complexity of the defense. Read more --->>

Violent Crimes

Violent Crimes include

Arson
Assault and Battery
Bank Robbery
Car Jacking
Domestic Abuse or Violence
Firearms / Gun / Weapons Offenses
Home Invasion
Homicide, incl. Murder and Manslaughter
Kidnapping
Sexual Assault
Robbery, Armed and Unarmed
Ethnic Intimidation

At Kammen & Associates, we have earned the respect needed in federal and state courts to handle these cases effectively. Read More --->>

Environment Crimes

State and Federal authorities increasingly target businesses and individuals who allegedly commit violations of technical State or Federal environmental regulations. These may include violations of the Clear Air or Water Acts, allegations of offenses committed at construction sites or other technical violations. Read More --->>

Tax Evasion

Tax offenses typically involve the non-reporting or under-reporting of income, sales, payroll and other taxes, as well as offenses stemming from the returns for such taxes. Both the state and federal governments aggressively use the criminal law to enforce tax violations. Moreover, in the process they seek visibility to deter taxpayers from cheating. Read More --->>

Fraud & Embezzlement

The government is vigilant in prosecuting frauds against government programs as well as schemes perpetrated against members of the public. Frauds against government programs can take a variety of forms, including program fraud, embezzlement, false statements to government entities, contract fraud, mail fraud and wire fraud. Frauds against members of the public also vary, and they include investment fraud schemes, bank fraud, credit union fraud, money laundering and securities fraud. Read More --->>

Drug Offenses

Criminal investigations of drug crimes involves a variety of aggressive investigative techniques, including the use of search warrants, grand jury subpoenas, forfeitures and wire taps. Investigating agents and officers move quickly, often giving people little time to make critical decisions. Read More --->>

Post Convication

In many cases, the outcome of a trial or a sentencing hearing is unsatisfactory. When this occurs, there is an opportunity for relief through an appeal, but effective assertion of legal claims on appeal is a matter that requires punctuality and experience. Read more --->>

Criminal Defense Attorney Richard Kammen has received the following honors;

• Named as one of the Best Lawyers in America from 1985 to 2008

• Designated as an Indiana Superlawyer from 2000-2008

• Member of the Faculty of the National Criminal Defense College 1982-present

• Member of the Faculty of Gerry Spence’s Trial Lawyers College 2001-present

• Member of the American Board of Criminal Defense Lawyers, 1990-present

• National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers Board of Directors 1986-2002

Getting Results in Criminal Cases:

Indianapolis criminal defense lawyers Richard Kammen and his Associates have the experience and skills necessary to get the results their clients need, as evidenced by the following verdicts:

State of Indiana v. Wendell Nance: Charged with 13 Counts of RICO, Securities Fraud and perjury. Not Guilty on all Counts.

United States of America v. Reginald Brown: E.D. Michigan, Federal death penalty case. Defendant charged with four murders. Murder Charges dismissed by the Government shortly prior to trial after a determination that the defendant was innocent.

State of Indiana v. Roland Webber: State Legislator Roland Webber was charged with State Tax Evasion. He was found not guilty on all counts after a four-day trial.

United States v. Steven Bush, United States District Court, Southern District of Indiana: Only defendant acquitted by a jury in an eight-defendant drug conspiracy case.

State of Indiana v. J. T., Defendant acquitted by a jury of allegedly molesting his 8 year old Granddaughter.